The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Validation and Optimization of an Image-Based Screening Method Applied to the Study of Neuronal Processes on Nanogrooves
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2018.00415 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alex J. Bastiaens, Sijia Xie, Dana A. M. Mustafa, Jean-Philippe Frimat, Jaap M. J. den Toonder, Regina Luttge |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 5 | 26% |
Materials Science | 3 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,540,789
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,605
of 4,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,014
of 352,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#142
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.