The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Atrial Fibrillation Mechanisms and Implications for Catheter Ablation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01458 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ghassen Cheniti, Konstantinos Vlachos, Thomas Pambrun, Darren Hooks, Antonio Frontera, Masateru Takigawa, Felix Bourier, Takeshi Kitamura, Anna Lam, Claire Martin, Carole Dumas-Pommier, Stephane Puyo, Xavier Pillois, Josselin Duchateau, Nicolas Klotz, Arnaud Denis, Nicolas Derval, Pierre Jais, Hubert Cochet, Meleze Hocini, Michel Haissaguerre, Frederic Sacher |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
Researcher | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 11% |
Unknown | 66 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 30% |
Engineering | 16 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 9% |
Unknown | 76 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,840,257
of 23,538,320 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7,004
of 14,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,069
of 349,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#224
of 451 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,538,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 451 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.