The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Burden of cancer pain in developing countries: a narrative literature review
|
---|---|
Published in |
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s181192 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhang Li, Tiara Aninditha, Brahim Griene, Javier Francis, Paulo Renato, Alain Serrie, Indira Umareddy, Sebastien Boisseau, Yacine Hadjiat |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
Researcher | 5 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 16% |
Unknown | 59 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 62 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,399,665
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#49
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,536
of 363,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.