↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical Modularity in Human Brain Functional Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
652 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hierarchical Modularity in Human Brain Functional Networks
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, October 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.11.037.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Meunier, Renaud Lambiotte, Alex Fornito, Karen D. Ersche, Edward T. Bullmore

Abstract

The idea that complex systems have a hierarchical modular organization originated in the early 1960s and has recently attracted fresh support from quantitative studies of large scale, real-life networks. Here we investigate the hierarchical modular (or "modules-within-modules") decomposition of human brain functional networks, measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging in 18 healthy volunteers under no-task or resting conditions. We used a customized template to extract networks with more than 1800 regional nodes, and we applied a fast algorithm to identify nested modular structure at several hierarchical levels. We used mutual information, 0 < I < 1, to estimate the similarity of community structure of networks in different subjects, and to identify the individual network that is most representative of the group. Results show that human brain functional networks have a hierarchical modular organization with a fair degree of similarity between subjects, I = 0.63. The largest five modules at the highest level of the hierarchy were medial occipital, lateral occipital, central, parieto-frontal and fronto-temporal systems; occipital modules demonstrated less sub-modular organization than modules comprising regions of multimodal association cortex. Connector nodes and hubs, with a key role in inter-modular connectivity, were also concentrated in association cortical areas. We conclude that methods are available for hierarchical modular decomposition of large numbers of high resolution brain functional networks using computationally expedient algorithms. This could enable future investigations of Simon's original hypothesis that hierarchy or near-decomposability of physical symbol systems is a critical design feature for their fast adaptivity to changing environmental conditions.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 652 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 3%
United Kingdom 11 2%
Italy 8 1%
Netherlands 6 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
Other 20 3%
Unknown 572 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 183 28%
Researcher 136 21%
Student > Master 75 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 47 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 6%
Other 119 18%
Unknown 53 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 98 15%
Psychology 88 13%
Computer Science 83 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 12%
Engineering 53 8%
Other 150 23%
Unknown 99 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#464
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,376
of 108,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them