↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy and Precision of the COSMED K5 Portable Analyser

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy and Precision of the COSMED K5 Portable Analyser
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01764
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ismael Perez-Suarez, Marcos Martin-Rincon, Juan José Gonzalez-Henriquez, Chiara Fezzardi, Sergio Perez-Regalado, Victor Galvan-Alvarez, Julian W. Juan-Habib, David Morales-Alamo, Jose A. L. Calbet

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 52 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 35 23%
Engineering 17 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 63 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,908,697
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,550
of 13,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,217
of 435,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#60
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.