The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A retrospective study on cervical intraepithelial lesions of low-grade and undetermined significance: evolution, associated factors and cytohistological correlation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.1322579 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Criseide Silva, Elia Cláudia Souza Almeida, Eliângela de Castro Côbo, Valéria Fátima Machado Zeferino, Eddie Fernando Cândido Murta, Renata Margarida Etchebehere |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 31 | 94% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 94% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#4
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,880
of 321,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.