The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Herbal Medicine Ninjin'yoeito in the Treatment of Sarcopenia and Frailty
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2018.00126 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nanami Sameshima Uto, Haruka Amitani, Yuta Atobe, Yoshihiro Sameshima, Mika Sakaki, Natasya Rokot, Koji Ataka, Marie Amitani, Akio Inui |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 32 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,843,776
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,252
of 5,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,784
of 439,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.