↓ Skip to main content

公立図書館図書選択論の理論的発展(V. 図書館資料論,<特集>300号記念「図書館・図書館学の発展-21世紀を拓く」)

Overview of attention for article published in The Library World, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
公立図書館図書選択論の理論的発展(V. 図書館資料論,<特集>300号記念「図書館・図書館学の発展-21世紀を拓く」)
Published in
The Library World, May 2017
DOI 10.20628/toshokankai.53.3_332
Authors

山本 昭和

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Library World
#42
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,602
of 328,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Library World
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.