The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004437.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiukui Hao, Bi Rong Dong, Jirong Yue, Taixiang Wu, Guan J Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 169 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,246,183
of 26,574,355 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,492
of 13,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,787
of 449,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,574,355 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.