The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antenatal interventions for fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004226.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachel Rayment, Susan J Brunskill, Peter W Soothill, David J Roberts, James B Bussel, Michael F Murphy |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 184 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
Researcher | 20 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
Other | 33 | 18% |
Unknown | 65 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 10% |
Unknown | 70 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,666,829
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,777
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,759
of 123,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.