You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing local climate vulnerability and winegrowers’ adaptive processes in the context of climate change
|
---|---|
Published in |
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11027-015-9698-0 |
Authors |
Etienne Neethling, Théo Petitjean, Hervé Quénol, Gérard Barbeau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 136 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 29 | 21% |
Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 10% |
Unknown | 37 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 32 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 48 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#5,914,153
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#413
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,977
of 403,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.