↓ Skip to main content

Separate Mechanisms for Audio-Tactile Pitch and Loudness Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Separate Mechanisms for Audio-Tactile Pitch and Loudness Interactions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey M. Yau, Alison I. Weber, Sliman J. Bensmaia

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
France 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 90 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 20%
Psychology 17 17%
Engineering 15 15%
Computer Science 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 18 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,555,964
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,103
of 30,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,777
of 165,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#46
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.