The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Non-invasive Biomarkers of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: Novel Targets and Strategies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2018.00358 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Eikmans, Els M. Gielis, Kristien J. Ledeganck, Jianxin Yang, Daniel Abramowicz, Frans F. J. Claas |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 14% |
Other | 17 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 49 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 6% |
Engineering | 6 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 11% |
Unknown | 69 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,582,522
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,774
of 5,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,855
of 438,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#22
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.