The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wide-Scale Continuous Quality Improvement: A Study of Stakeholders' Use of Quality of Care Reports at Various System Levels, and Factors Mediating Use
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00378 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alison F. Laycock, Jodie Bailie, Nikki A. Percival, Veronica Matthews, Frances C. Cunningham, Gillian Harvey, Kerry Copley, Louise Patel, Ross Bailie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 22% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 25 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Psychology | 3 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 23 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,118,420
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,822
of 10,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,482
of 437,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#31
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.