You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Regional diversity in subsistence among early farmers in Southeast Europe revealed by archaeological organic residues
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2018.2347 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lucy J. E. Cramp, Jonathan Ethier, Dushka Urem-Kotsou, Clive Bonsall, Dušan Borić, Adina Boroneanţ, Richard P. Evershed, Slaviša Perić, Mélanie Roffet-Salque, Helen L. Whelton, Maria Ivanova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 23% |
Japan | 4 | 15% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 88% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 20 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 23 | 35% |
Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 24 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2022.
All research outputs
#869,514
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,080
of 11,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,773
of 451,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#38
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.