The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Lung Recruitment Strategies During High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Preterm Lambs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2018.00436 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martijn Miedema, Karen E. McCall, Elizabeth J. Perkins, Regina B. Oakley, Prue M. Pereira-Fantini, Anushi E. Rajapaksa, Andreas D. Waldmann, David G. Tingay, Anton H. van Kaam |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Uruguay | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 26% |
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,004,485
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,990
of 6,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,737
of 437,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#68
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.