The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Optimal Chinese Herbal Injections for Use With Radiotherapy to Treat Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2018.01470 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dan Zhang, Mengwei Ni, Jiarui Wu, Shuyu Liu, Ziqi Meng, Jinhui Tian, Xiaomeng Zhang, Bing Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 28% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,665,776
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,466
of 16,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,890
of 437,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#211
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.