You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Data Integration Multi-Omics Approach to Study Calorie Restriction-Induced Changes in Insulin Sensitivity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01958 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Carlota Dao, Nataliya Sokolovska, Rémi Brazeilles, Séverine Affeldt, Véronique Pelloux, Edi Prifti, Julien Chilloux, Eric O. Verger, Brandon D. Kayser, Judith Aron-Wisnewsky, Farid Ichou, Estelle Pujos-Guillot, Lesley Hoyles, Catherine Juste, Joël Doré, Marc-Emmanuel Dumas, Salwa W. Rizkalla, Bridget A. Holmes, Jean-Daniel Zucker, Karine Clément, The MICRO-Obes Consortium, Aurélie Cotillard, Sean P. Kennedy, Nicolas Pons, Emmanuelle Le Chatelier, Mathieu Almeida, Benoit Quinquis, Nathalie Galleron, Jean-Michel Batto, Pierre Renault, Stanislav Dusko Ehrlich, Hervé Blottière, Marion Leclerc, Tomas de Wouters, Patricia Lepage |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
France | 3 | 10% |
China | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 52% |
Scientists | 11 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
Researcher | 18 | 17% |
Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 39 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,244,633
of 26,548,096 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,233
of 15,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,358
of 452,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#48
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,548,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.