↓ Skip to main content

Escherichia coli Uses Separate Enzymes to Produce H2S and Reactive Sulfane Sulfur From L-cysteine

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Escherichia coli Uses Separate Enzymes to Produce H2S and Reactive Sulfane Sulfur From L-cysteine
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00298
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai Li, Yufeng Xin, Guanhua Xuan, Rui Zhao, Huaiwei Liu, Yongzhen Xia, Luying Xun

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 3 4%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,560,927
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#15,448
of 25,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,042
of 352,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#453
of 676 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 676 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.