The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Experimental Evaluation of Factors Affecting Temporal Variability of Water Samples Obtained from Long‐Screened Wells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ground Water, December 2005
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02830.x |
Authors |
Thomas E. Reilly, Denis R. LeBlanc |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 58% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 5 | 42% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,247,700
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water
#247
of 884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,609
of 166,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.