The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Haemoglobin and haematocrit targets for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003967.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giovanni FM Strippoli, Sankar D Navaneethan, Jonathan C Craig, Suetonia C Palmer |
Abstract |
Anaemia affects 60% to 80% of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) reduces quality of life and is a risk factor for early death. Treatment options are blood transfusion, erythropoietin (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa. Recently higher haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (HCT) targets have been widely advocated because of positive associations with improved survival and quality of life from observational studies. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Brunei Darussalam | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 174 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 11% |
Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 16% |
Unknown | 72 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Unknown | 75 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,498,233
of 26,794,081 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,077
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,379
of 88,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.