The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Opportunities and barriers for endangered species conservation using payments for ecosystem services
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Conservation, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.017 |
Authors |
Aaron M. Lien, Colleen Ulibarri, Wendy Vanasco, George B. Ruyle, Scott Bonar, Laura López-Hoffman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 22 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 17% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,551,539
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#3,476
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,788
of 364,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#54
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.