The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diagnostic Value of FDG PET-CT Quantitative Parameters and Deauville-Like 5 Point-Scale in Predicting Malignancy of Focal Thyroid Incidentaloma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2019.00024 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philippe Thuillier, David Bourhis, Nathalie Roudaut, Geneviève Crouzeix, Zarrin Alavi, Ulrike Schick, Philippe Robin, Véronique Kerlan, Pierre-Yves Salaun, Ronan Abgral |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Iceland | 1 | 20% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 27% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 40% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,233,838
of 23,865,786 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,722
of 6,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,156
of 451,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#26
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,865,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.