↓ Skip to main content

More Is Not Always Better: Evaluation of 1D and 2D-LC-MS/MS Methods for Metaproteomics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
More Is Not Always Better: Evaluation of 1D and 2D-LC-MS/MS Methods for Metaproteomics
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tjorven Hinzke, Angela Kouris, Rebecca-Ayme Hughes, Marc Strous, Manuel Kleiner

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Professor 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 7%
Chemistry 5 6%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#2,929,632
of 26,583,927 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,319
of 30,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,337
of 464,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#90
of 633 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,583,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 633 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.