Title |
Embodying self-compassion within virtual reality and its effects on patients with depression
|
---|---|
Published in |
BJPsych Open, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002147 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caroline J. Falconer, Aitor Rovira, John A. King, Paul Gilbert, Angus Antley, Pasco Fearon, Neil Ralph, Mel Slater, Chris R. Brewin |
Abstract |
Self-criticism is a ubiquitous feature of psychopathology and can be combatted by increasing levels of self-compassion. However, some patients are resistant to self-compassion. To investigate whether the effects of self-identification with virtual bodies within immersive virtual reality could be exploited to increase self-compassion in patients with depression. We developed an 8-minute scenario in which 15 patients practised delivering compassion in one virtual body and then experienced receiving it from themselves in another virtual body. In an open trial, three repetitions of this scenario led to significant reductions in depression severity and self-criticism, as well as to a significant increase in self-compassion, from baseline to 4-week follow-up. Four patients showed clinically significant improvement. The results indicate that interventions using immersive virtual reality may have considerable clinical potential and that further development of these methods preparatory to a controlled trial is now warranted. None. © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 10 | 13% |
Ireland | 2 | 3% |
Italy | 2 | 3% |
Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Greece | 1 | 1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 40 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 48 | 62% |
Scientists | 16 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 487 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 77 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 62 | 13% |
Researcher | 52 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 6% |
Other | 68 | 14% |
Unknown | 140 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 145 | 29% |
Computer Science | 38 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 5% |
Engineering | 21 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 20 | 4% |
Other | 90 | 18% |
Unknown | 158 | 32% |