The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009600 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Denise O'Connor, Matthew J Page, Shawn C Marshall, Nicola Massy‐Westropp |
Abstract |
Non-surgical treatment, including ergonomic positioning or equipment, are sometimes offered to people experiencing mild to moderate symptoms from carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The effectiveness and duration of benefit from ergonomic positioning or equipment interventions for treating CTS are unknown. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 210 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 13% |
Researcher | 17 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 5% |
Other | 38 | 18% |
Unknown | 74 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 13% |
Psychology | 15 | 7% |
Engineering | 9 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 8% |
Unknown | 79 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,192,144
of 26,794,081 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,248
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,174
of 256,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.