↓ Skip to main content

Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009600
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denise O'Connor, Matthew J Page, Shawn C Marshall, Nicola Massy‐Westropp

Abstract

Non-surgical treatment, including ergonomic positioning or equipment, are sometimes offered to people experiencing mild to moderate symptoms from carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The effectiveness and duration of benefit from ergonomic positioning or equipment interventions for treating CTS are unknown.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Other 11 5%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 74 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 13%
Psychology 15 7%
Engineering 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 79 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,192,144
of 26,794,081 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,248
of 13,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,174
of 256,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,794,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.