↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of Micro-Computed Tomography in Post-mortem Evaluation of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease. Comparison Between Post-mortem Micro-CT and Conventional Autopsy.

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of Micro-Computed Tomography in Post-mortem Evaluation of Fetal Congenital Heart Disease. Comparison Between Post-mortem Micro-CT and Conventional Autopsy.
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fped.2019.00092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilla Sandrini, Lucia Rossetti, Vanessa Zambelli, Roberta Zanarotti, Franca Bettinazzi, Roberta Soldá, Concetta Di Pace, Stiljan Hoxha, Flavio Luciano Ribichini, Giuseppe Faggian, Claudio Lombardi, Giovanni Battista Luciani

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Student > Master 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 54%
Unspecified 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,928,373
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,495
of 6,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,648
of 350,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#46
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.