The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exploring the Relationship (and Power Dynamic) Between Researchers and Public Partners Working Together in Applied Health Research Teams
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Sociology, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00020 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gill Green, Tracey Johns |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 19% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Timor-Leste | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 30 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 62% |
Scientists | 14 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 8 | 13% |
Psychology | 6 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 27 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,622,794
of 26,423,535 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sociology
#98
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,464
of 367,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sociology
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,423,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.