The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Football Players Do Not Show “Neural Efficiency” in Cortical Activity Related to Visuospatial Information Processing During Football Scenes: An EEG Mapping Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00890 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudio Del Percio, Mauro Franzetti, Adelaide Josy De Matti, Giuseppe Noce, Roberta Lizio, Susanna Lopez, Andrea Soricelli, Raffaele Ferri, Maria Teresa Pascarelli, Marco Rizzo, Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Fabrizio Stocchi, Cristina Limatola, Claudio Babiloni |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Professor | 3 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Researcher | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 24 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 13 | 23% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 11% |
Psychology | 5 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 28 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,290,814
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,511
of 30,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,244
of 349,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#334
of 647 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 647 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.