↓ Skip to main content

Developmental Programming in Response to Maternal Overnutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developmental Programming in Response to Maternal Overnutrition
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2011.00027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Z. Alfaradhi, Susan E. Ozanne

Abstract

Metabolic disorders have seen an increased prevalence in recent years in developed as well as developing countries. While it is clear lifestyle choices and habits have contributed to this epidemic, mounting evidence suggests the nutritional milieu during critical stages of development in early life can "program" individuals to develop the metabolic syndrome later in life. Extensive epidemiological data presents an association between maternal obesity and nutrition during pregnancy and offspring obesity, and a number of animal models have been established in order to uncover the underlying mechanisms contributing to the programming of physiological systems. It is hard to distinguish the causal factors due to the complex nature of the maternal-fetal relationship; however, in order to develop adequate prevention strategies it is vital to identify which maternal factor(s) - be it the diet, diet-induced obesity or weight gain - and at which time during early development instigate the programmed phenotype. Curtailing the onset of obesity at this early stage in life presents a promising avenue through which to stem the growing epidemic of obesity.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 5 2%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 259 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 18%
Student > Bachelor 43 16%
Student > Master 39 14%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 54 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 16%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 62 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,831,001
of 24,217,496 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,115
of 13,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,495
of 187,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#10
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.