The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Five Critical Decisions in Breast Augmentation Using Five Measurements in 5 Minutes: The High Five Decision Support Process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1097/01.prs.0000191163.19379.63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John B. Tebbetts, William P. Adams |
| Abstract |
Surgeons' decisions impact patient outcomes and implant effects on tissues over time. Tissue assessment systems that provide quantitative, objective data enable objective rather than subjective decisions. First-generation dimensional systems for breast augmentation defined a desired result dimensionally and recommended an implant to force tissues to the desired result. A second-generation system, the TEPID system, defines measurements to match the implant to the patient's tissue characteristics, instead of forcing tissues to a desired result. This study defines a third-generation decision support process that prioritizes five critical decisions, identifies five key measurements, and completes all preoperative assessment and operative planning decisions in breast augmentation in 5 minutes or less. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 20% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Researcher | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 39 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 147 | 78% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,554,646
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#1,558
of 10,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,993
of 168,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.