The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Landing-Takeoff Asymmetries Applied to Running Mechanics: A New Perspective for Performance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00415 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rodrigo Gomes da Rosa, Henrique Bianchi Oliveira, Natalia Andrea Gomeñuka, Marcos Paulo Bienert Masiero, Edson Soares da Silva, Ana Paula Janner Zanardi, Alberito Rodrigo de Carvalho, Pedro Schons, Leonardo Alexandre Peyré-Tartaruga |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 7 | 50% |
France | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 57% |
Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 32 | 37% |
Engineering | 5 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 38 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,651,349
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#900
of 13,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,254
of 319,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#46
of 428 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 428 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.