↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Three Different Bioinformatics Analyses of the 16S–23S rRNA Encoding Region for Bacterial Identification

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comparison of Three Different Bioinformatics Analyses of the 16S–23S rRNA Encoding Region for Bacterial Identification
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nilay Peker, Sharron Garcia-Croes, Brigitte Dijkhuizen, Henry H. Wiersma, Evert van Zanten, Guido Wisselink, Alex W. Friedrich, Mirjam Kooistra-Smid, Bhanu Sinha, John W. A. Rossen, Natacha Couto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Student > Master 23 12%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 73 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 79 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,541,760
of 26,547,438 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,905
of 30,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,388
of 351,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#73
of 648 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,547,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 648 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.