The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
STOC Free: An Innovative Framework to Compare Probability of Freedom From Infection in Heterogeneous Control Programmes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fvets.2019.00133 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annika M. van Roon, Inge M. G. A. Santman-Berends, David Graham, Simon J. More, Mirjam Nielen, Aurélien Madouasse, Mathilde Mercat, Christine Fourichon, Jörn Gethmann, Jenny Frössling, Ann Lindberg, Carla Correia-Gomes, George J. Gunn, Carola Sauter-Louis, Madeleine K. Henry, Linda van Duijn, Gerdien van Schaik |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 27% |
Mathematics | 2 | 8% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,488,895
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#1,380
of 6,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,965
of 349,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#34
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.