↓ Skip to main content

Simulation of cholinergic and noradrenergic modulation of behavior in uncertain environments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simulation of cholinergic and noradrenergic modulation of behavior in uncertain environments
Published in
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fncom.2012.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael C. Avery, Douglas A. Nitz, Andrea A. Chiba, Jeffrey L. Krichmar

Abstract

Attention is a complex neurobiological process that involves rapidly and flexibly balancing sensory input and goal-directed predictions in response to environmental changes. The cholinergic and noradrenergic systems, which have been proposed to respond to expected and unexpected environmental uncertainty, respectively, play an important role in attention by differentially modulating activity in a multitude of cortical targets. Here we develop a model of an attention task that involves expected and unexpected uncertainty. The cholinergic and noradrenergic systems track this uncertainty and, in turn, influence cortical processing in five different, experimentally verified ways: (1) nicotinic enhancement of thalamocortical input, (2) muscarinic regulation of corticocortical feedback, (3) noradrenergic mediation of a network reset, (4) locus coeruleus (LC) activation of the basal forebrain (BF), and (5) cholinergic and noradrenergic balance between sensory input and frontal cortex predictions. Our results shed light on how the noradrenergic and cholinergic systems interact with each other and a distributed set of neural areas, and how this could lead to behavioral adaptation in the face of uncertainty.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Switzerland 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 59 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 34%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 21%
Neuroscience 12 18%
Computer Science 7 10%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,230
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1,046
of 1,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,924
of 244,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#55
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.