↓ Skip to main content

Nanofibrous Scaffolds Support a 3D in vitro Permeability Model of the Human Intestinal Epithelium

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanofibrous Scaffolds Support a 3D in vitro Permeability Model of the Human Intestinal Epithelium
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2019.00456
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamie D. Patient, Hadi Hajiali, Kate Harris, Bertil Abrahamsson, Christer Tannergren, Lisa J. White, Amir M. Ghaemmaghami, Philip M. Williams, Clive J. Roberts, Felicity R. A. J. Rose

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 31%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,681,024
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,485
of 16,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,047
of 350,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#269
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.