You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Individual differences in working memory capacity and cue-guided behavior in humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-43860-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Garofalo, Simone Battaglia, Giuseppe di Pellegrino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 17 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,164,001
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#65,583
of 125,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,974
of 351,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,701
of 3,043 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,043 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.