The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Grief, Mindfulness and Neural Predictors of Improvement in Family Dementia Caregivers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00155 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Felipe A. Jain, Colm G. Connolly, Leonardo C. Moore, Andrew F. Leuchter, Michelle Abrams, Ramzi W. Ben-Yelles, Sarah E. Chang, Liliana A. Ramirez Gomez, Nora Huey, Helen Lavretsky, Marco Iacoboni |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Researcher | 10 | 9% |
Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
Professor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 43 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 20 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 14 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 44 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,732,140
of 26,325,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,346
of 7,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,415
of 368,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#56
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,325,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.