The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of Different Risk-Stratification Systems for the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.00378 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yan Shen, Miao Liu, Jie He, Shu Wu, Ming Chen, Yonglin Wan, Linjun Gao, Xiaoyan Cai, Jun Ding, Xiaohong Fu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 17% |
Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,034,109
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,379
of 23,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,043
of 369,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#149
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.