The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Update on vaccine development for renal cell cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research and Reports in Urology, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.2147/rru.s7242 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Walter Storkus |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 33% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 25% |
Psychology | 2 | 17% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,897,110
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Urology
#57
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,681
of 94,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Urology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them