↓ Skip to main content

Surface Acting or Deep Acting, Who Need More Effortful? A Study on Emotional Labor Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surface Acting or Deep Acting, Who Need More Effortful? A Study on Emotional Labor Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongbiao Lu, Wenfeng Wu, Gaoxing Mei, Shouying Zhao, Haibo Zhou, Daling Li, Deng Pan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 41 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 13%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 42 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,289,896
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#621
of 7,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,929
of 350,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#6
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.