The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Animal Models and Animal Experimentation in the Development of Deep Brain Stimulation: From a Specific Controversy to a Multidimensional Debate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2019.00051 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sonia Desmoulin-Canselier, Baptiste Moutaud |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 16 | 26% |
Engineering | 8 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,451,320
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#667
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,104
of 350,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.