The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Optimization of Window Study Endpoints in Endometrial Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.00428 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah J. Kitson, Zoe Maskell, Vanitha N. Sivalingam, Joseph Shaw, Emma J. Crosbie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 38% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,193,865
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,397
of 22,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,408
of 364,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#31
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.