The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of Re-acidification on Buffalo Grass Rhizosphere and Bulk Microbial Communities During Phytostabilization of Metalliferous Mine Tailings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01209 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Linnea K. Honeker, Catherine F. Gullo, Julia W. Neilson, Jon Chorover, Raina M. Maier |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 28% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 19% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,276,623
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#7,635
of 25,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,456
of 350,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#213
of 631 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 631 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.