↓ Skip to main content

Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why, when and how to update a meta-ethnography qualitative synthesis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0218-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma F. France, Mary Wells, Heidi Lang, Brian Williams

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Psychology 15 12%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Computer Science 8 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 30 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,980,683
of 26,450,612 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#305
of 2,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,552
of 315,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,450,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.