↓ Skip to main content

The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 3,748)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
10416 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7627 Mendeley
citeulike
20 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Published in
Scientific Data, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, Philip E. Bourne, Jildau Bouwman, Anthony J. Brookes, Tim Clark, Mercè Crosas, Ingrid Dillo, Olivier Dumon, Scott Edmunds, Chris T. Evelo, Richard Finkers, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Alasdair J.G. Gray, Paul Groth, Carole Goble, Jeffrey S. Grethe, Jaap Heringa, Peter A.C ’t Hoen, Rob Hooft, Tobias Kuhn, Ruben Kok, Joost Kok, Scott J. Lusher, Maryann E. Martone, Albert Mons, Abel L. Packer, Bengt Persson, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Marco Roos, Rene van Schaik, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Erik Schultes, Thierry Sengstag, Ted Slater, George Strawn, Morris A. Swertz, Mark Thompson, Johan van der Lei, Erik van Mulligen, Jan Velterop, Andra Waagmeester, Peter Wittenburg, Katherine Wolstencroft, Jun Zhao, Barend Mons

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 937 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7,627 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 20 <1%
United States 18 <1%
Spain 11 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Other 25 <1%
Unknown 7527 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1495 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1195 16%
Student > Master 837 11%
Student > Bachelor 432 6%
Other 419 5%
Other 1279 17%
Unknown 1970 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 780 10%
Computer Science 725 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 537 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 398 5%
Environmental Science 353 5%
Other 2392 31%
Unknown 2442 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2264. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,913
of 26,586,231 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#2
of 3,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38
of 316,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,586,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.