The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
O voto de saias: a Constituinte de 1934 e a participação das mulheres na política
|
---|---|
Published in |
Estudos Avançados, February 2004
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0103-40142003000300009 |
Authors |
Rita de Cássia Barbosa de Araújo |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 47% |
Professor | 3 | 18% |
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 8 | 47% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 24% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#9,094,966
of 26,764,666 outputs
Outputs from Estudos Avançados
#242
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,654
of 65,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estudos Avançados
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,764,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.