The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Principal Component Analysis Reveals the Proximal to Distal Pattern in Vertical Jumping Is Governed by Two Functional Degrees of Freedom
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00193 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily J. Cushion, John Warmenhoven, Jamie S. North, Daniel J. Cleather |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 18% |
Australia | 2 | 7% |
United States | 2 | 7% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Czechia | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
Scientists | 11 | 39% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 16% |
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 13 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
Engineering | 6 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,149,496
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#259
of 8,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,346
of 357,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
#5
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.