The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the Young Deadly Free Peer Education Training Program: Early Results, Methodological Challenges, and Learnings for Future Evaluations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00074 |
Authors |
Belinda D'Costa, Roanna Lobo, Jessica Thomas, James Steven Ward |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 18% |
Psychology | 4 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#20,576,667
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#7,876
of 10,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,539
of 352,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#60
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.