Title |
Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure in lowering blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a critical review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Integrated Blood Pressure Control, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.2147/ibpc.s70402 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fernanda Fatureto-Borges, Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho, Luciano F Drager |
Abstract |
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an extremely common comorbid condition in patients with hypertension, with a prevalence of ~50%. There is growing evidence suggesting that OSA is a secondary cause of hypertension, associated with both poor blood pressure (BP) control and target organ damage in patients with hypertension. The application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during sleep is the gold standard treatment of moderate- to-severe OSA and very effective in abolishing obstructive respiratory events. However, several meta-analyses showed that the overall impact of CPAP on BP is modest (~2 mmHg). There are several potential reasons for this disappointing finding, including the heterogeneity of patients studied (normotensive patients, controlled, and uncontrolled patients with hypertension), non-ideal CPAP compliance, clinical presentation (there is some evidence that the positive impact of CPAP on lowering BP is more evident in sleepy patients), and the multifactorial nature of hypertension. In this review, we performed a critical analysis of the literature evaluating the impact of CPAP on BP in several subgroups of patients. We finally discussed perspectives in this important research area, including the urgent need to identify predictors of BP response to CPAP and the importance of precision medicine in this scenario. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 21% |
Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
Chemistry | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 23% |